Mundo plural: ¿por qué los individuos hacen lo que hacen?
Main Article Content
Abstract
In a context of hyper-specialization, the article addresses a panoramic view of society and a complex conception of individuals, while not forgetting both the theoretical ambition and the empirical pulse. To this end, it asks: "why do individuals do what they do?", and proposes to respond with a universal formula for the study of practices that combines a dispositional dimension with a contextualist one. On the one hand, the dispositions and competences of individuals, understood as the internalized product of more or less frequent access to certain contexts of action. On the other hand, present contexts of action and their diversity. From this formula, the article evaluates different approaches to the social: on the one hand, the oblivion of the past, characteristic of pragmatist, interactionist and rational choice sociologies; on the other hand, the neglect of contexts, typical of certain uses of Bourdieu's sociology and certain psychoanalytic theories. Finally, the article reviews the diversity of contemporary research in social sciences (in relation to the scale of observation, the level of social reality studied, the interest in knowledge, the type of object, the time scales, the number of actors studied, etc.), showing that the dispositional-contextualist approach can guide works in such different directions.
Downloads
Article Details
Obra disponible bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es).
References
Bourdieu, P. (2002). La distinción: Criterio y bases sociales del gusto. México: Taurus, (ed. francesa Paris, Minuit, 1979, p. 112).
Changues, J.P. (2002): L’Homme de vérité. Paris: Edition Odile Jacob.
Court, M. (2010). Corps de filles, corps de garçons: une construction sociale. Paris: La Dispute.
Denave, S. (2008). Ruptures professionnelles. Processus, contextes et dispositions, tesis de doctorado de sociología, Universidad Lumière Lyon 2, 24 de noviembre de 2008.
Draganski, B.; Gaser, C.; Busch, V. et al. (2004). Neuroplasticity : changes in grey matter induced by training, Nature, n° 427, p. 311-312.
Draganski, B.; Gaser, C., Kempermann, G. et al. (2006). Temporal and spatial dynamics of brain structure changes during extensive Learning, The Journal of Neuroscience, n° 26, p. 6314-6317.
Elias, N. (1990). La sociedad de los individuos. Barcelona: Edicions 62 (ed. francesa, Paris, Fayard, 1991, p.104).
Fussman, G. (2006). Croyance, raison et déraison. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.
Gauss, M. (1971). Sociología y antropología. Madrid: Tecnos (ed. francesa Paris, PUF, Quadrage, 1991, p.283-310).
Henri-Panabière, G. (2010). Des héritiers en « échec scolaire ». Paris: La Dispute.
Hume, D. [1740], 2002. Traité de la nature humaine. Web quebequense de los « Clásicos de las ciencias sociales» http://www.uqac.uquebec.ca/zone30/Classiques_des_sciences_sociales/index.html.
Lahire, B. (1195).Tableaux de familles. Heurs et malheurs scolaires en milieux populaires. Paris: Gallimard/Seuil, Hautes Études.
Lahire. B. (2004). El Hombre plural. Los resortes de la acción. Barcelona: Bellaterra (ed. francesa Paris, Nathan, Essais & Recherches, 1998).
Mennesson, C. (2005). Être une femme dans le monde des hommes. Socialisation sportive et construction du genre. Paris: L’Harmattan.